My Bloody Valentine, mbv

12 Feb

I have to say that my first reaction, other than a kind of thrill that I was listening to new MBV material, was that I was slightly surprised at how similar-sounding to Loveless it was. I thought after 22 years there would be more of a change of direction. I’m not implying at all that I was disappointed, definitely not. But still, the first 3 tracks sound as if they could quite easily be out-takes from Loveless. There is the same, slow, lazy, guitar-driven haze of sound; the same languid drums. The lyrics, in the main, are still as indecipherable as stereogram illusions. They are to me anyway – I have never seen anything in those feckin pattern things – maybe you will hear something in these vocals, but I’m not really sure if it matters – they are effectively like another instrument, another layer of sound, which is possibly the main intention.

About mid-way through the second track, Only Tomorrow, a riff comes in, and I imagine the sound of a million indie kids celebrating as they hear “a bit of tune” emerging from the tidal wave of endless subtle chord changes.

Track 3, Who Sees You, also has a kind of riff towards the end, sounding slightly like early Teenage Fanclub – I’m not making any kind of direct comparison, it’s really just that it’s a similar guitar sound.

    

When we get to tracks 4 and 5, there is a slight diversion. Now keyboards are to the fore. I assume it’s keyboards anyway. Every single sound on Loveless, whether it was the sound of a flute, or whatever, was supposed to be sampled guitar feedback, and it’s possible that’s what they’ve done this time, but whatever the actual effect is, I think it’s been programmed through a keyboard. The start to track 4, Is This And Yes (have to say, the titles of the tracks once again seem like little more than signifiers) actually sounds almost like the start to an old World of Twist b-side (the Barrett 200 mix of Sweets). Stereolab is a slightly lazier, more obvious reference. There is a nice bass effect resounding throughout. Track 5, If I Am, again features (what I assume to be) keyboards, but with this one, the vocals are more prominent.

    

Track 6 is the closest thing on the album to a “song” (you can even make out some of the words!). The first thing this reminded me of was Big City by Spacemen 3, to the extent that I even wonder if it’s been sampled for this one.

Track 7, In Another Way, with a seething drumbeat (is this possibly the “drum and bass” track we’d been promised?), and orchestral type sounds, at the moment is my favourite track – I really can imagine classical music fans having an appreciation for this one. Very uplifting, but still, with added distortion, disturbing at the same time.

    

Track 8, Nothing Is, is the closest thing to a heavy metal track on the album. And let’s not forget that as MBV have a reputation for being very loud indeed when playing live, I’m sure they have a good few fans who are also into metal. This one – it’s just a looped guitar sound, sounding almost like a sample from Gimme All Your Lovin’ by ZZ Top, with an incessant beat – is also pretty awesome.

Which leads me to Track 9. I have to say that the concluding track, Wonder 2, is the only thing approaching a disappointment for me. I suppose it does work quite well as a conclusion, in that it is just a cacophony of sound – there’s something like a jet engine noise running through it, there are bits of the angelic type vocal, bits of keyboard, bits of everything, like they’ve chucked the kitchen sink at it. I suppose without being anything in particular, it does serve as a summary of what MBV are about – just the whole in-your-faceness of it. Just not sure if it works so effectively as a stand-alone track, as most of the others might. If it is someone holding up a scorecard at the end, it’s probably just a great big respectful blank sheet of paper.

I feel that mbv is possibly not as complex as Loveless, with perhaps not quite so many layers.  I say it’s similar, but then again, the more I listen and become acquainted with it, if that’s possible, I’m not even sure if that’s correct. I think it’s true to say that it’s more like Loveless than Isn’t Anything, which would go against what Kevin Shields himself has said of it. So many contradictions. Suffice to say that anything I’ve said in this review, after just a few initial listens, is subject to drastic alteration on a few more listens! I wondered about not writing a traditional style review of this album at all, but instead perhaps cut-and-pasting a whole load of jumbled spam, or something! While being stylistic, I’m not sure this would have been the right response either though.

There is the question of how to listen to this album. Undoubtedly, at the maximum volume your ears will allow. Maybe while doing other things, like the hoovering perhaps, if you have it on your iPod. It is very good as background music – it’s so abstract that it allows you to concentrate on other things, whether it’s playing a game of poker or chess, reading a paper, going to the loo, driving. I think it would be great to have sex to (haven’t tried this out yet), although the only thing I wonder is that as no two people are ever going to have the same view of this album, you may end up quarrelling about the music, which might not be such a good thing. Perhaps you could listen to it while indulging in “solo sex”. Definitely, it would work as background music while you draw and paint, either abstract or formal art. It is definitely art itself, that almost goes without saying. It is magical, that also goes almost without saying. However much you might love it yourself, you know of course that it can also be used as a tool to annoy the hell out of someone else. Don’t stop listening to it, is one piece of advice I’d give, listen to it as often as you can, in as many different scenarios. Not sure about listening to it while getting stoned though – I don’t think you’d want to be listening to it too closely, as that really might fuck your head up.

One point I’ve considered is that if this is the sound of schizophrenia, it’s interesting that, however bizarre they might sound, My Bloody Valentine are almost the acceptable sound of schizophrenia, which is a slightly odd thing. And why is that, because they’re successful and have made money? Is it those things that make mental illness acceptable? Just being contentious now I think.

In essence, this album is a triumph. It’s caught people by surprise. Everyone knows the music industry is mostly in a bit of a mess. Sales are down, and what is selling is depressingly staid. Bands won’t try to replicate this album. But it serves as a very good reminder that you don’t have to do the corporate thing – why not be a bit more way out? We have a new My Bloody Valentine album. It’s something to embrace and cherish. I’m not sure if it’s ground-breaking in the way that Loveless was, but, and this is just going on a few listens, I think it is a pretty solid, but, like Loveless, multi-lateral at the same time; despite being unique, all kinds of influences can be heard. It is mad, but coherent. Pleasingly, once again, it’s almost as loud as a nuclear bomb. It should be listened to a lot, and if you don’t mind, that’s what I’m going to go back to do now.

This review first appeared on Godisinthetvzine

Spread the love

Pages: 1 2

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply